创建

登录 ReadmeX

或

了解我们如何处理你的信息: 隐私政策

ReadmeX

陪你读懂 AI 动态

今天,想先了解什么?

选一份动态总结,或直接聊聊你的问题。

社区和关注动态总结只属于你自己。

资讯

qwen3-4b-deslop:去掉AI写作腔的Qwen3-4B微调模型发布

AI 总结

开发者发布 qwen3-4b-deslop,这是基于 Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 的 LoRA 微调模型,目标是去掉助手式写作习惯,提供完整精度权重以及面向 Ollama 和 llama.cpp 的 2.5 GB Q4_K_M GGUF 版本。按作者自写的正则式“slop”检测器,在 40 条未参与训练的提示上,得分从每千词 121 降至 12.5,破折号从每千词 20.5 降到零,68% 的回答落在作者划定的人类写作区间;一个中间版本得分 9.9,但写出的评论文章没有立场、还编造研究,作者用第二轮“任务契合度”过滤修正,代价是得分略有回升。作者称模型仍能答对 30 道事实题中的 30 道,并在体裁与长度契合度上与原始模型相当,但提醒尚无读者盲测验证该分数,任务契合度检查只是简单规则且训练数据也用同一套规则筛选,长对话、其他语言与工具调用上的表现可能不优于甚至差于原模型。

深度见解

作者表示这套蒸馏流程不依赖模型规模,下一步是把同样流程用于 70 亿至 80 亿参数以及约 300 亿参数的模型,并加入由人挑选更优文本的盲测。

TL;DR

  • I trained the assistant writing habits out of Qwen3-4B-Instruct and released it as qwen3-4b-deslop. With Ollama it's ollama run hf.co/erikkannike/qwen3-4b-deslop-v4-GGUF:Q4_K_M, a 2.5 GB download.
  • On 40 prompts it never saw in training, the slop score dropped from 121 to 12.5 per 1000 words, and 68% of answers score in the range of human writing. Em dashes went from 20.5 per 1000 words to zero.
  • It still answers 30 of 30 factual questions correctly and fits the requested genre and length as often as the original. Its predictions on human-written prose moved about a third as much as with runtime steering.
  • An intermediate version scored 9.9 and wrote badly: opinion pieces without an opinion, invented studies, and a new habit of joining every sentence with ", which". Fixing that took a second filter that checks whether an answer does what the prompt asked.
  • The voice is plain to the point of flat, and it still invents names and places.

My home lab is a MacBook Air, so this is a 4B model trained on 161 answers. The recipe doesn't depend on the model size, and running it on larger models is the next step.

#qwen3-4b-deslop#Qwen3-4B-Instruct#Qwen#Ollama#llama.cpp

原文约 7 分钟读完阅读原文
群聊

还没有评论,来说说你的看法。