创建

登录 ReadmeX

或

了解我们如何处理你的信息: 隐私政策

ReadmeX

陪你读懂 AI 动态

今天,想先了解什么?

选一份动态总结,或直接聊聊你的问题。

社区和关注动态总结只属于你自己。

资讯

奥特曼据报向员工提出三种AI安全终局

AI 总结

据《The Rundown AI》转述《The Information》的报道,OpenAI 首席执行官 Sam Altman 上周在一次内部讲话中提出 AI 安全的三种可能终局。其一是仿照国际原子能机构建立的全球执法机构,报道称 Altman 倾向这一方案;其二是以 DeepMind 联合创始人 Demis Hassabis 命名的“Demis 方案”,即把顶尖实验室合并为一家、以类似 CERN 的方式服务伙伴国家;其三是以 AI 研究者 Eliezer Yudkowsky 命名的情形——某家实验室凭借自我改进的 AI“烧掉其他所有人的 GPU”,Altman 称其“很糟糕”。报道还称,Altman 把 OpenAI 目前“模型通过安全测试即发布”的做法称为“pacing 1.0”,并表示需在一年内选定路径,即“pacing 2.0”,其中必须为自我改进的 AI 设定“限速”或停止点。

深度见解

报道称,奥特曼的这些设想与 Anthropic 的 Jack Clark 的说法似乎一致,后者谈到智能上限,并表示世界只有“少数几年”时间来就安全采取行动。

摘自汇总《Sam Altman’s three endings for the AI safety ra…》

The details:

  • The report claims Altman favored plan 1: a global enforcer built like the International Atomic Energy Agency, which OAI has lobbied for since 2023.
  • The “Demis plan” (named after DeepMind co-founder Demis Hassabis) folds top labs into one lab serving partner countries, similar to CERN’s particle research.
  • Altman called plan three (named for AI researcher Eliezer Yudkowsky) “terrible,” with one lab riding self-improving AI to “melt everyone else’s GPUs.”
  • He called picking a path, due within a year, “pacing 2.0,” and said it must include a “speed limit” or stopping point for self-improving AI.

Why it matters: Anthropic’s Jack Clark just talked about an intelligence cap and said the world has “a small number of years” to act on safety — and Altman’s scenarios seem aligned with his No. 1 rival. An Avengers-style team-up of top labs under one roof would make for a fun plot, but as with every pact so far, getting the rest of the field is not easy.

#OpenAI#Sam Altman#DeepMind#Demis Hassabis#International Atomic Energy Agency#CERN#Anthropic#Jack Clark#Eliezer Yudkowsky

原文约 1 分钟读完阅读原文
群聊

还没有评论,来说说你的看法。