Kimi K3 hands-on: strong 3D front-end coding, but quota burns fast
A Juejin AI blogger published a hands-on test of Kimi K3, describing it as clearly stronger than the previous K2.7 on multi-modal front-end and 3D tasks, with a clean plan-then-verify workflow, but uneven across tasks. In the author's tests K3 handled a 3D garage page and a Super Mario recreation well, while it produced a flawed 3D billiards game and a less rich "cyberpunk Along the River During the Qingming Festival" scene than Fable 5. The author reports that access to K3 requires a 99-yuan-or-higher plan and that 1M context requires the 199-yuan tier, and that roughly five test pages exhausted a week's quota in under a day, with the first example alone using about 37% of the weekly allowance.
The author's account suggests that for Kimi K3, quota and pricing—not just benchmark scores—may determine whether it is usable for real projects, since a single test consumed about 37% of a weekly quota on the 99-yuan plan.
K3 已测,确实强,但要命的是配额太少了!
一天不到,一周的配额已经烧完了,大概就生成了 5 个测试页面!
从五个例子中,可以知道,有些确实很强,有些呢又差点意思,有些比较糟糕。
我不是那种收钱办事儿只会吹牛逼的博主,我也不会针对 Kimi 只说它的缺点。我会依次给大家展现测试结果,同时和其它国产模型,和国外的 GPT 5.6 和 Fable 5 做一个对比,尤其是 Fable 5!
下面我就一点一点来说,看完这篇文章大家应该对K3有一个相对全面的解了。
Some source content is omitted. Continue reading on the original site.
#Kimi K3#Moonshot AI#Fable 5#GPT-5.6 Sol#KimiCode#GLM 5.2#Hunyuan 3#Grok 4.5#DeepSeek Pro#Claude Code#Opus 4.8