KimiCode
AI overview
Sign in and the AI will write an overview from our coverage.
Headlines · 2
- Hands-on test compares Codex, ZCode and KimiCode computer control
An unnamed Juejin AI author tested Codex with GPT-6.1 Sol, ZCode with 5.3 Flash, and KimiCode with K3.1 Pro on a workflow that uploaded reference images, submitted Tripo3D jobs, downloaded files, and archived them. KimiCode completed the workflow in about 20 minutes at an estimated API-equivalent cost of ¥56.20, while ZCode took about two hours at an estimated ¥7.05; Codex finished in 18 minutes 59 seconds at an estimated ¥10.63 but could not complete the download because its computer-control tool repeatedly stopped when it could not reliably identify the browser URL.
掘金 · 人工智能 · 🔥 0 - Kimi K3 hands-on: strong 3D front-end coding, but quota burns fast
A Juejin AI blogger published a hands-on test of Kimi K3, describing it as clearly stronger than the previous K2.7 on multi-modal front-end and 3D tasks, with a clean plan-then-verify workflow, but uneven across tasks. In the author's tests K3 handled a 3D garage page and a Super Mario recreation well, while it produced a flawed 3D billiards game and a less rich "cyberpunk Along the River During the Qingming Festival" scene than Fable 5. The author reports that access to K3 requires a 99-yuan-or-higher plan and that 1M context requires the 199-yuan tier, and that roughly five test pages exhausted a week's quota in under a day, with the first example alone using about 37% of the weekly allowance.
掘金 · 人工智能 · 🔥 0
Experience and discussion from the community
Share my KimiCode experienceAsk about KimiCode
Nobody has shared their experience with KimiCode yet.