Create

Sign in to ReadmeX

or

How we handle your data: Privacy Policy

ReadmeX

Your AI reading companion

What would you like to catch up on?

Pick a briefing, or ask your own question.

Your community and people briefings stay personal to you.

Story

Hands-on test compares Codex, ZCode and KimiCode computer control

AI summary

An unnamed Juejin AI author tested Codex with GPT-6.1 Sol, ZCode with 5.3 Flash, and KimiCode with K3.1 Pro on a workflow that uploaded reference images, submitted Tripo3D jobs, downloaded files, and archived them. KimiCode completed the workflow in about 20 minutes at an estimated API-equivalent cost of ¥56.20, while ZCode took about two hours at an estimated ¥7.05; Codex finished in 18 minutes 59 seconds at an estimated ¥10.63 but could not complete the download because its computer-control tool repeatedly stopped when it could not reliably identify the browser URL.

In-depth insight

The same-task comparison provides concrete observations about the speed, cost, and reliability of three AI coding agents when automating a browser-and-desktop workflow, while its single-run and author-calculated findings should not be treated as controlled benchmarks.

今天终于被 Codex 气到了!

这个“小辣鸡”一直吹的“无敌电脑操作能力”彻底崩溃了!

然后问题还没解决,配额又被清空了。 接下来还要合并 Codex 和 ChatGPT 配额,这还怎么玩啊!

我就今天用了一下下,只剩 48% 了! 你说这 Plus 账号还有什么用呢?

#Codex#ZCode#KimiCode#GPT-6.1 Sol#5.3 Flash#K3.1 Pro#Tripo3D

Original · 11 min readRead the original
Group chat

No comments yet. Start the conversation.