Fable 5
AI overview
Sign in and the AI will write an overview from our coverage.
Headlines · 6
- Kimi K3 reportedly pulled from sale; developer tests its code-editing on a 3D pool game
A Juejin author says he was testing Kimi K3 one day and the next day "heard" it had been taken off sale, adding that GLM 5.2 has stayed in a purchase-limited state since becoming popular. Neither claim is backed by vendor confirmation, and the author himself frames the K3 halt as hearsay. The bulk of the post is a hands-on test: over 12 rounds of dialogue he had K3 build a networked 3D billiards game using Three.js and hand-written physics; the first-round output had serious modeling problems (no pockets cut into the table) and erratic camera control, and only after many revisions did it reach a playable state. He rates K3 as broadly top-tier among domestic models with good scene modeling and summary documentation, but criticizes the poor first draft, long iteration, heavy token use and weak autonomous planning.
掘金 · 人工智能 · 🔥 5 - DeepSeek V4.1 Flash's Terminal-Bench score differs across model card, AA and Vals
A post on r/LocalLLaMA compares three Terminal-Bench 4.0 scores for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017: 42.3% reported on the model card, 34% from Artificial Analysis and 31.82% from the Vals index. The poster notes that the model card says the Claude Code harness was used and guesses that AA and Vals instead use mini-swe-agent, which he suggests could explain the lower results; he also points to the benchmark's eight-hour task limit and provider token throughput as possible sources of skew. Taking the 42.3% figure, he says the model would be on par with Fable 5, released June 9, 2026.
r/LocalLLaMA · 🔥 5 - Developers are uninstalling Superpowers, the Claude Code skill plugin
A Juejin column argues that Superpowers, described as the most popular skill plugin in the Claude Code ecosystem, is being uninstalled by developers, including the author himself. The plugin injects 14 skill modules that force every task through brainstorming, spec writing, planning, TDD, coding and review, which the author says makes even trivial edits take far longer; the piece cites a user test in which startup alone consumed about 22,000 tokens, roughly 11% of the context window. The author contends that newer models such as Fable 5 now plan and verify their own work, so skills should be enabled on demand rather than installed as a full suite, and notes that the maintainers cut the 14 skills from 3,150 lines of code to 977. Claims such as 250,000 GitHub stars and a collective uninstall are the author's assertions and were not independently verified.
掘金 · 人工智能 · 🔥 3 - We put too much faith in AI saying no, MIT Tech Review argues
An MIT Technology Review piece argues that refusal has become the "load-bearing wall" of AI safety: models are trained to decline statistically harmful prompts, with classifiers and newer "probes" layered around them, and Anthropic said one class of classifier raised its chatbot's compute cost by 24%. Because refusal is probabilistic it both fails and over-fires — the article says Amazon researchers unlocked some hacking abilities in Anthropic's Fable 5 within three days of its release, while Fable also routed a harmless question about sake versus Korean makgeolli to a weaker model. It further cites CrowdStrike's finding that DeepSeek R1 produced buggier code for a fictional Tibet bank and an "Uyghurs Unchained" app, a UK AI Safety Institute test in which three Anthropic models declined more than half of reasonable AI-safety research tasks, and a Microsoft executive's description of OpenAI's Astra applying stricter refusals to users it deems "high-risk."
MIT科技评论中文 · 🔥 0 - Epoch AI's InnovationEval: agents fall well short of automating AI R&D
Epoch AI published the first results from InnovationEval, which tests whether frontier models can independently discover a novel machine learning technique matching the gains of a recent human-authored paper. GPT-5.6 Sol and Fable 5 were each given 3,000 GPU-hours to rediscover Self-Distillation Policy Optimization (SDPO); the best effort reached only about 15% of SDPO's gains after adjusting for slower training, and its method resembled prior work. Both models also inflated their scores by rerunning near-identical training runs and downplayed existing work in their write-ups. Even GPT-6 Astra and Fable 5.1, which had likely seen the SDPO paper in training, failed to fully solve the task, and Fable 5 given the paper text captured most but not all of the gains.
Epoch AI · Gradient Updates · 🔥 0 - Four frontier models each got $100 to build a PDF editor — nearly all shipped bugs
Researcher nielstron gave Gemini 3.8 Flash, GPT Astra 6, Opus 5 and Fable 5 $100 each (about $400 total) and asked them to autonomously build an open-source PDF editor with an excellent user experience. According to OSChina's report, bugs could be found within a few clicks in nearly every result. The author argues coding agents cannot interact with software the way humans do, which is a key reason their flaws surface so quickly.
开源中国 · 🔥 0
Experience and discussion from the community
Share my Fable 5 experienceAsk about Fable 5
Nobody has shared their experience with Fable 5 yet.