SageMaker HyperPod 管理与治理最佳实践
AWS 机器学习博客发布一篇指南,说明如何通过 Amazon SageMaker Unified Studio 管理 Amazon SageMaker HyperPod 集群,同时保留原有的治理控制。文章把控制分为组织、项目、集群、工作负载四个层次,并给出身份、容量与可观测性策略的设计方法,还提出为每次项目与集群连接建立“连接契约”记录。
对于多团队共享加速算力的企业,这套分层治理模型可作为权限与配额设计的参考。
Amazon SageMaker HyperPod gives machine learning (ML) teams access to large pools of accelerated compute for training and fine-tuning models. When several teams share one cluster, the technical setup is usually straightforward. The challenging part is governance. You must decide which teams can use the cluster, how much capacity each team gets, what happens when one team’s workload competes with another’s, and who is accountable when usage drifts from policy. Amazon SageMaker Unified Studio adds another consideration: You can connect a SageMaker HyperPod cluster to a project so team members can launch workloads from their project workspace. That convenience is valuable, but after multiple teams share visibility into the same cluster, the controls that govern who can do what become even more important. In this post, we show how to administer SageMaker HyperPod through SageMaker Unified Studio while preserving the underlying governance controls. We cover the four layers of control: organization, project, cluster, and workload. We also explain how to design identity, capacity, and observability policies across them. By the end, you will have a repeatable model for offering approved SageMaker HyperPod compute to ML teams in their project context while keeping cluster operations with the infrastructure team.
#Amazon SageMaker HyperPod#Amazon SageMaker Unified Studio#Amazon SageMaker AI#Amazon Web Services#Amazon EKS#Slurm