Create

Sign in to ReadmeX

or

How we handle your data: Privacy Policy

ReadmeX

Your AI reading companion

What would you like to catch up on?

Pick a briefing, or ask your own question.

Your community and people briefings stay personal to you.

Story

UCSB and Microsoft's ScholarEvolve lets AI agents read papers to rewrite their own harness

AI summary

Researchers at UC Santa Barbara and Microsoft have proposed ScholarEvolve, a system that automates reading research papers, implementing their methods as code and evaluating the resulting changes to an AI agent's harness, the software layer that surrounds a model. It splits the harness into five modules—Tools, Context, Skills, Memory and Workflow—and uses a Research Agent and a Coding Agent to retrieve work from sources such as arXiv, group approaches by mechanism through topic modeling and test candidate combinations. In author-reported results, ScholarEvolve raised Qwen3.5-27B's completion rate on AppWorld Challenge from 49.6% to 63.6% without changing the model's parameters, and also reported gains for GPT-5.4-mini on AppWorld Challenge and τ²-Bench Telecom; the figures have not been independently verified.

In-depth insight

The work targets the harness layer around a model rather than model weights, reporting that automatically importing methods from research literature can improve agent task completion, though the benchmark numbers are author-reported.

机器之心 2026-10-21 12:01 北京

AI Agent 能否像研究人员一样,从论文中学习?

最近两年,大语言模型的能力不断提升,围绕模型构建的 AI Agent 也逐渐能够处理复杂的任务。从调用工具、操作软件,到规划和执行多步骤工作流,Agent 从处理简单的问答,走向能够独立解决长程复杂工具调用的任务。与此同时,每天也都有很多新的 agent 领域的 preprint 公开在 arXiv 中。

但一个现实问题随之出现:当 Agent 遇到能力瓶颈时,我们该如何让它变得更好?

#ScholarEvolve#UCSB#Microsoft#Qwen3.5-27B#GPT-5.4-mini#AppWorld#τ²-Bench#Meta Harness

Original · 7 min readRead the original
Group chat

No comments yet. Start the conversation.