As AI gaffes pile up, users stop hiding their AI use
A translated commentary on Huxiu AI examines “AI shame”: many people depend on AI daily but are reluctant to admit using it for their most important work. It cites recent embarrassments, including an AI prompt left inside a printed novel and an AI follow-up question appended to a Weibo holiday post by commentator Hu Xijin, who has since openly acknowledged relying on AI. The piece references a 2024 Microsoft and LinkedIn survey of 31,000 people across 31 countries in which 52% of AI users said they would not admit using it for important tasks, and a study in which seven detectors flagged 61.3% of 91 TOEFL essays by Chinese test-takers as AI-generated. It also notes Hebei University has opened an investigation into a doctoral thesis reported for fabricated references and suspected AI generation, arguing that use of AI need not be shameful but output must be checked.
AI shame shapes how openly workplaces and creators adopt these tools, while unreliable AI detectors can unfairly penalize non-native English writers.

很多人日常已经离不开AI了,于是用AI翻车的事情最近屡见不鲜,揪出来后更是为人民群众喜闻乐见。有人在阅读《终焉路独行》实体书时,发现了一句AI反馈提示“需要我再微调部分语句,让整体文风更贴合悬疑灵异的氛围吗”。还有胡锡进在微博上发的国庆文案,文末居然带着“需要我帮你通篇通读再核对一遍零遗漏,确保完全贴合你的口......
本文来自微信公众号: 非凡油条 ,作者:豆腐乳儿,原文标题:《拒绝“AI羞耻”!年轻人懒得装了》
很多人日常已经离不开AI了,于是用AI翻车的事情最近屡见不鲜,揪出来后更是为人民群众喜闻乐见。
有人在阅读《终焉路独行》实体书时,发现了一句AI反馈提示“需要我再微调部分语句,让整体文风更贴合悬疑灵异的氛围吗”。
#DeepSeek#Microsoft#LinkedIn#Bilibili#Hebei University#Tongji University