Essay warns AI overuse quietly erodes deep thinking and independent judgment
An opinion essay republished by Huxiu AI and originally published by the WeChat account 极智GeeTech argues that the real risk of the AI era is not replacement by machines but users voluntarily handing over the reins of thought. It describes a habitual loop of asking, waiting and copying answers, and says heavy reliance differs from gaming or short-video addiction because it wears away deep thinking, critical judgment and independent reasoning. The author notes that medicine does not yet classify "AI addiction" as a formal diagnosis, with academics preferring terms such as problematic AI use or AI over-dependence, and cites studies including an estimated 5–10% prevalence of problematic generative AI use, a JAMA Network Open survey of more than 20,000 U.S. adults, and Chinese surveys on students and workers.
The piece frames cognitive offloading to AI as a workplace and education concern, citing surveys that report heavy reliance among students and professionals and reduced independent thinking.

AI时代,我们面临的真正危机,不是被AI取代,而是正在主动交出思考的主导权。打开AI对话窗口,提问、等待、复制。短短几秒,一篇文稿、一套方案、一道难题的答案直接呈现。学生用AI完成作业、职场人依靠AI产出材料、创作者让AI构思故事,甚至普通人遇到选择困惑,第一反应也是询问AI的建议。生成式AI普及的几年里,生......
本文来自微信公众号: 极智GeeTech ,作者:半山
AI时代,我们面临的真正危机,不是被AI取代,而是正在主动交出思考的主导权。
打开AI对话窗口,提问、等待、复制。短短几秒,一篇文稿、一套方案、一道难题的答案直接呈现。学生用AI完成作业、职场人依靠AI产出材料、创作者让AI构思故事,甚至普通人遇到选择困惑,第一反应也是询问AI的建议。
#极智GeeTech#Microsoft#Carnegie Mellon University#University of California, Berkeley#JAMA Network Open#Computers in Human Behavior#China Youth Daily#China Youth Research Center