Why Some Enterprises Put on an AI Hat Without Changing Operations
In an authorized TMTPost column, 影子备忘录 argues that many companies treat AI as an identity label or narrative rather than integrating it into workflows, data, and organizational decisions. The article contrasts that approach with manufacturing examples from 日照钢铁 and 友达光电, whose reported gains include higher production efficiency, lower defect rates, and lower costs. It recommends identifying specific operational pain points and comparing AI solutions with existing approaches before deployment.
The commentary highlights a practical enterprise AI issue: technical tools alone may not produce sustained value without corresponding changes to processes, data, and workforce preparation.
（本文作者为 影子备忘录，钛媒体经授权发布）
文 | 影子备忘录
这两年了解观察过不少企业，无论是上市多年的大厂，还是才创立几年的小厂，从几百人的中型公司到只有十几个人的初创团队。都有一个越来越强烈的感受：都在聊AI叙事，都在拥抱AI。
帽子是个很妙的东西。戴上它，你立刻有了某种身份感。会议PPT里不出现“大模型”“智能体”“AI原生”，似乎就矮了一截；老板在年会上不喊两句“全面拥抱AI”，好像就交不了差。
这顶至少看起来便宜，它比起重构一条产线、改造一套流程，买一个AI账号、签一份“智能体”合同，在财务报表上确实体面了不少。
但帽子终究是帽子。它戴在头上，不在身体里。风一吹会掉，人多的时候要扶，回到家第一件事就是摘下来。
#Deloitte#McKinsey#BCG#MIT NANDA#日照钢铁#友达光电#IBM Watson Health#Zillow Offers#Klarna#RAND