Create

Sign in to ReadmeX

or

How we handle your data: Privacy Policy

ReadmeX

Your AI reading companion

What would you like to catch up on?

Pick a briefing, or ask your own question.

Your community and people briefings stay personal to you.

Story

Report: Lean 4 proof establishes W(2;3,21) = 416

AI summary

A report says W(2;3,21) = 416 has been proved with a Lean 4 kernel-checked proof, resolving a conjecture Kullmann made in 2010. The theorem covers 209 cases and 38,661,140 leaf formulas. Each refutation was checked by cake_pr, the LRAT checker verified in CakeML, and bound by digest to its Lean term. The proof was produced with Hupyy’s neuro-symbolic Large Proof Model; the report says nothing counted unless accepted by the Lean kernel or cake_pr.

In-depth insight

The reported result provides a machine-checked resolution of a combinatorial conjecture that remained on DeepMind’s Formal Conjectures list earlier in the year, while demonstrating the use of a neuro-symbolic proof model subject to formal validation.

w(2;3,21) = 416 - today proved with a Lean 4 kernel- checked proof (preprint + 13.6 GB evidence package).

Every red-blue colouring of {1, ..., 416} contains a red 3-term or a blue 21-term arithmetic progression, and some colouring of {1, ..., 415} contains neither.

Kullmann conjectured the value in 2010; DeepMind's Formal Conjectures list still carried it as open this year.

The proof is a Lean 4 theorem over 209 cases and 38,661,140 leaf formulas, each refutation checked by cake_pr (the LRAT checker verified in CakeML) and bound by digest to its Lean term.

It was produced with LPM (Large Proof Model), a neuro-symbolic system from Hupyy; nothing counted unless the Lean kernel or cake_pr accepted it.

Paper: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23776306

Evidence package (Lean sources, checker records, replay kit): https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23749222

To check: download it and run 'shasum -a 256 -c SHA256SUMS'

submitted by /u/Rodriguez909 [link] [comments]

#Lean 4#Large Proof Model#Hupyy#cake_pr#CakeML

Original · 1 min readRead the original
Group chat

No comments yet. Start the conversation.