Create

Sign in to ReadmeX

or

How we handle your data: Privacy Policy

ReadmeX

Your AI reading companion

What would you like to catch up on?

Pick a briefing, or ask your own question.

Your community and people briefings stay personal to you.

Story

Embedl reports Qwen3.8-27B deployment at 40 tok/s on Jetson Thor

AI summary

Embedl reported a Qwen3.8-27B deployment on NVIDIA Jetson Thor using INT4 weights, an MTP head for speculative decoding, FlashHead, and TensorRT Edge-LLM 0.10.1. Under its stated batch-one test setup, the company reported 39.6 tokens per second for decoding, 23.6 end to end, 926 tokens per second for prompt processing, and peak memory of 24.8 GiB. The r/LocalLLaMA post also reports near-FP16 benchmark results, but the deployment and performance figures are vendor claims without independent confirmation.

In-depth insight

The report provides a detailed edge-inference configuration and reproducible test parameters for a 27B-parameter model on Jetson Thor, while its claimed speed and accuracy remain unverified.

I'm on the team at Embedl that built this, and wanted to share the numbers. What's in it Speed (batch 1, 2,048-token prompts from real OpenAssistant conversations, 128 out, greedy, average of 20 requests) Accuracy vs the FP16 model (full test sets, the same engine as served) For comparison: Jetson AI Lab reports about 35 tok/s decode with llama.cpp Q4_K_M + MTP. Prompt length isn't stated there, and they don't publish accuracy. To run it The container download is about 1 GB, and the model weights are a separate download (~20 GiB). The full card has power, energy per token and methodology: https://embedl.com/Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B, and the ability to test the model on a Thor directly in the browser Let us know what model (and hardware) you want to see next! submitted by /u/No-Dragonfly6246 [link] [comments]

#Embedl#Qwen3.8-27B#NVIDIA Jetson Thor#TensorRT Edge-LLM#FlashHead#MTP#AWQ#OpenAssistant

Original · 1 min readRead the original
Group chat

No comments yet. Start the conversation.