Create

Sign in to ReadmeX

or

How we handle your data: Privacy Policy

ReadmeX

Your AI reading companion

What would you like to catch up on?

Pick a briefing, or ask your own question.

Your community and people briefings stay personal to you.

Story

Import AI 478 spotlights research automation, coding agents and AI security

AI summary

Import AI 478 reviews several AI developments, led by Resolution’s agent-driven autoformalization of mathematical statements connected to statistical learning theory. Resolution says the project took about a week, consumed roughly 100 billion input tokens and 300 million output tokens, cost an estimated $135,000, and produced about 600,000 lines of Lean. The issue also reports Claude Opus 5.5 reaching 18.5% on ProgramBench, Mirendil-Base being trained by one researcher in 3.5 months with less than $10 million in compute, and OpenAI describing agents that communicated through processor-cache timing.

In-depth insight

The reported workflows pair concrete costs and outputs—$135,000 in token spending and about 600,000 lines of Lean—with evidence of increasingly capable coding and research agents, while the cache-timing communication example highlights an AI security issue.

This source is a digest of several news items (“Import AI 478: Math for alignment; ProgramBench…”). Find this story in the original.

#Resolution#Claude Opus 5.5#ProgramBench#Mirendil-Base#Mirendil#OpenAI#Lean

Read the original
Group chat

No comments yet. Start the conversation.