WIRED实测六款常驻AI代理,Dots总榜最佳
WIRED的软件记者用24小时测试六款常驻AI代理,比较任务执行、浏览器控制、主动通知、价格和易用性。OpenAI Dots获得总榜最佳,Meta Muse紧随其后且被认为最容易上手,Anthropic的Claude Duet则获得最佳界面评价。这些结果来自记者的个人实测而非标准化基准,测试中的智能体仍会犯错。
WIRED的跨产品实测具体呈现了六款消费级AI代理在执行可靠性、易用性、界面设计和价格方面的差异,但其结论属于个人体验而非标准化评测。
Last year, I remember sitting in WIRED’s office, complaining to my colleagues nonstop about how much AI agents suck. They were just bad at everything.
As a software reporter, I sat through meeting after meeting where tech bros—mostly men—demonstrated how their new agent would revolutionize my everyday life and automate away the tedium. The catch was that none of these so-called “agents” actually worked.
Fast-forward to today, and always-on AI agents are booming, with major players racing to release their own versions to attract early adopters. The key reason these personal agents are hitting the larger zeitgeist, beyond Silicon Valley nerds, is that they work. Well, at least more reliably than last year. AI agents still make mistakes, but I also see significant improvements in following through on tasks and controlling a browser. These little guys got their glow-up.
It can be hard to know where to start with AI agents and which one best fits your automation needs. So I spent a day experimenting with every major AI agent to understand their strengths and weaknesses. Before going to bed on Wednesday last week, I set up six always-on agents on my iPhone: Meta’s Muse, OpenAI’s Dots, Instinct, Anthropic’s Claude Duet, Google’s Gemini Spark, and xAI’s Grok Bot.
#OpenAI Dots#Meta Muse#Anthropic Claude Duet#Google Gemini Spark#xAI Grok Bot#Instinct#OpenClaw#ChatGPT#Gemini