20美元套餐五小时编程容量实测
AI 总结
Reddit 用户 /u/Sufficient-Storage87 在 Claude Pro 和 ChatGPT Plus 上运行同一个涉及 8 个文件的 WeasyPrint 功能开发任务，并在每种设置运行 2至4 次前后读取用量表。根据单次任务占用五小时限额的比例，作者估算每个窗口约可完成 33 个 Sonnet 5.5、20 个 Haiku 5.5、18 个 Codex Sol 6.1 和 6 个 Opus 5.5 任务。作者认为 Haiku 数量较少可能是因为完成同一功能时耗时更长并多次复查代码，同时称 Opus 每次约消耗周限额的 1%，Sonnet 和 Codex 约为 0.5%。
深度见解
这项对比基于用量表读数，具体呈现了多个编程模型在 20 美元套餐中完成单次功能开发任务时的限额消耗情况。
| I wanted a straight answer to "what does $20 actually get me" for coding, so I ran the same task on each setup and read the usage meter before and after. Setup - Task: a real 8-file feature in WeasyPrint (the same one from my earlier token-saver test) - Every model on its default settings, nothing tuned. Opus runs on medium effort by default in Claude Code, Codex Sol 6.1 on medium in Codex - Claude Pro ($20) for the Claude models, ChatGPT Plus ($20) for Codex - Usage read from each tool's own meter, 2–4 runs per setup Share of the 5-hour limit one task used Weekly limit barely moved per task: about 1% for Opus, about 0.5% for Sonnet and Codex. The surprise: Haiku is the "cheap" model and still fit fewer tasks than Sonnet. My guess is it took longer and went back over the code more to get the same feature done, so it ate more of the window even at a lower rate. Caveats - 2–4 runs per setup, so these are estimates, not exact numbers - One task type. A small bug fix or a huge refactor would shift the numbers - The meter only shows whole percentages, so the small ones (3%, 5%) are rough - Defaults only. Opus on low effort costs a lot less; I tested that separately and will post it If you're on Pro and mostly writing features, Sonnet gets you the most work per window by a wide margin. submitted by /u/Sufficient-Storage87 [link] [comments] |
#Anthropic#OpenAI#Claude Pro#ChatGPT Plus#Sonnet 5.5#Haiku 5.5#Opus 5.5#Codex Sol 6.1#Claude Code#Codex#WeasyPrint