AI product managers and Personal Agents: the gap between strategy and user scenarios
The piece argues that Personal Agents carry huge strategic value — they are the first recipient of user intent and a potential new interface and service distribution layer — with Grok Bot, Meta Muse and OpenAI's dots all arriving in recent months. Yet the hard part is the scenario: users need what products cannot yet do, while products do what users do not need, so many agents fall back to personal-efficiency tasks like scheduling, recording and email triage. Using WeChat's years of post-2010 iteration as an analogy, the author says only eyesight for larger adjacent opportunities and patience with unglamorous details can close the gap between strategic value and real user scenarios.
A useful reminder for agent teams that picking the right starting scenario shapes the iteration path more than the size of the strategic narrative.
做产品，总是很容易概念很美好，落地很骨感。战略价值巨大，用户需求七零八碎。用户需要的，产品做不到。产品能做的，用户并不需要。裸眼3D、VR、元宇宙，机器人，以及今天各种各样的AI能力，都反复遇到这个问题。比如，一个盘算着买机器人回家照顾老人的人，看到2025年那场机器人马拉松里，工程师拿着遥控器一路陪跑，他的......
本文来自微信公众号： 取木Axel ，作者：取木，原文标题：《【关于 AI 产品经理】战略价值和用户场景之间的鸿沟，要用什么来填？》
做产品，总是很容易概念很美好，落地很骨感。战略价值巨大，用户需求七零八碎。