用户称Terra 6.1快速耗用Codex额度
一名连续185天使用Codex的Reddit用户称,Terra 6.1可能迅速消耗每周额度的15%,却只完成少量工作。其表示,Medium和High档位经常无法正确完成任务或中途停止,需要Sol检查并修复输出。关于Claude Opus 5.5、成本及地区功能差异的说法均属于个人体验,未经独立基准测试验证。
该帖提供了关于Terra 6.1在Codex中的效率、可靠性和额度消耗情况的一手信号,但单一用户体验不能代表产品的整体表现。
Explain this to me: With my $100 Claude subscription, I burn through my weekly limits slower using Opus 5.5 on Medium than I do with my $100 OpenAI subscription doing basic tasks. And in my experience, Opus absolutely destroys Terra 6.1 at any effort level.
I've been using Codex every single day for 185 days. Back when I started with GPT-5.5, exhausting my weekly limit was genuinely difficult, usually only possible with heavy Fast Mode usage. Now Terra 6.1 can burn through 15% of my weekly allowance in no time, with barely anything accomplished. Sure, I could use Terra on Medium or High, but then it either fails to complete tasks correctly or simply gives up halfway through. Sol has to review and fix everything afterward, wasting even more time and tokens. How exactly is that more efficient?
And before someone brings up those impressive-looking 3D demos: I've seen the tests. Most results are a joke. Terra on Max can deliver decent quality, but at roughly 90% higher cost than Sol 6.1 Medium, which achieves comparable results. Where's the value? Even if Terra 6.1 was designed for Dots, **where the hell is Dots in Europe?** Every time OpenAI releases features unavailable to European subscribers while charging us the same full price, it feels like we're getting ripped off. To be fair, Anthropic, Google, and others are guilty of this too.
#OpenAI#Codex#Terra 6.1#GPT-5.5#Sol 6.1#Anthropic#Claude Opus 5.5#Claude Sonnet 5.5#Claude Haiku 5.5