Create

Sign in to ReadmeX

or

How we handle your data: Privacy Policy

ReadmeX

Your AI reading companion

What would you like to catch up on?

Pick a briefing, or ask your own question.

Your community and people briefings stay personal to you.

LLaMA 3.3 70B

AI overview

Sign in and the AI will write an overview from our coverage.

Headlines · 1

  1. MIT's HugAgent tests whether AI 'digital twins' can predict people in new scenarios

    Researchers at MIT and other institutions propose HugAgent, a benchmark that uses interviews with 54 real participants to test whether large models can portray a specific person—not just restate current views but predict how that person would answer previously unseen hypothetical scenarios on universal healthcare, public surveillance and housing densification, across 1,742 evaluation items; the paper was accepted as an EMNLP 2026 Main Oral. Models did best at inferring a person's current beliefs (top accuracy 77.56%; GPT-4o 74.66%, against an 84.84% two-week self-consistency ceiling), while on the belief-dynamics update task the best result was 68.61% (Claude Sonnet 4.5), then LLaMA 3.3 70B at 67.57% and GPT-4o at 63.11%, against an 85.66% human ceiling. Personal interviews clearly helped prediction (GPT-4o rose from 39.83% to 63.11%), but adding more interview rounds did not consistently improve forecasts for new situations.

    虎嗅 AI · 🔥 0

Experience and discussion from the community

Share my LLaMA 3.3 70B experienceAsk about LLaMA 3.3 70B

Nobody has shared their experience with LLaMA 3.3 70B yet.