WorkBuddy, Doubao, Qwen Office and Kimi compared as office AI agents
A third-party review compared Tencent WorkBuddy, Doubao Work, Qwen Office and Kimi on the same 4,510 store records covering five brands from January to September 2026, asking each to write a 2,000-word analysis and a visual report. WorkBuddy was the only one to deduplicate September rows (942 records to 940 stores; 353 to 351 for the largest brand); Kimi and Doubao missed the duplicates, and Qwen Office conflated monthly records with store counts, calling three airport stores logged over nine months "27 airport stores" and reporting 700 mall stores where the data showed 83. Doubao delivered an HTML page with seven interactive charts, Kimi a nine-slide deck, and Qwen Office and WorkBuddy twelve-slide decks. Personal monthly plans start at 49 yuan (Kimi), 68 (Doubao), 70 (WorkBuddy) and 78 (Qwen Office); WorkBuddy, Qwen Office and Doubao list 198 yuan per seat per month for enterprise tiers, while Kimi Premium is 4,200 yuan per seat per year with annual payment and a two-seat minimum. The review cites Moonshot examples of about 0.03 yuan to recommend a rock song and 1.6 yuan for a week-long Sichuan road trip plan, and notes no token-to-credit conversion standard is published.
It shows office AI agents are now judged on data-verification accuracy and predictable cost, not just fluent output.