西方AI焦虑与全球南方乐观心态的分歧
《Rest of World》刊发的一篇评论文章认为,西方对AI的焦虑情绪与全球南方国家普遍乐观的态度存在明显分歧,并将这一差异部分归因于人口结构与现实需求。作者引用斯坦福2025年AI Index数据称,中国83%、印尼80%、泰国77%的受访者认为AI产品利大于弊,而美国为39%、荷兰为36%;皮尤研究中心2025年调查则显示,仅17%的美国成年人认为AI未来20年会对国家产生积极影响。文章还提及中国的AI微短剧已成为数十亿美元规模的产业,其中一部由云南兼职婚礼摄影师制作、成本不到500美元的《Zombie Cleaner》在海外获得数千万次观看,作者据此认为AI降低了进入文化市场的门槛。
它提醒从业者,AI的采用、治理与产品叙事在不同地区差异显著,全球南方围绕具体需求的务实用例可能反过来影响未来的产品与政策模板。
On a recent Sunday afternoon, I was invited to debate AI’s impact on the cultural sector alongside Dutch politicians and creative-industry leaders. I was the lone optimist, arguing that if fear and risk become our primary lens for governing artificial intelligence, we will design systems around what we want to prevent rather than what we want to use them for. Then I said something that was harder for the room to hear: The Global South is home to some of AI’s most enthusiastic and inventive users, and their experiments could help us rethink our own institutions.
In the West, fear of AI has helped turn pessimism into a cultural virtue.
The U.S. is no different from Europe. A culture of fear encourages protectionism: We hunker down and romanticize legacy systems rather than ask what might replace them. Creative industries in the majority world have spent decades navigating piracy and weak enforcement, forcing them to think beyond rights-based policing about how creators actually receive value. Anghami, the biggest music app in the Middle East, for instance, pays musicians from their first stream, rather than only after a song reaches a minimum threshold. It has approached AI pragmatically, using it to curate, tag, and attribute creative work rather than simply blocking and banning.
#Pew Research Center#Stanford AI Index#India Stack#EuroStack#Anghami#Zombie Cleaner