Create

Sign in to ReadmeX

or

How we handle your data: Privacy Policy

ReadmeX

Your AI reading companion

What would you like to catch up on?

Pick a briefing, or ask your own question.

Your community and people briefings stay personal to you.

Story

NVIDIA NeMo Gym cuts Siemens EDA chip-design agent turns 66%, lifts score to 95%

AI summary

NVIDIA published a technical blog describing how Siemens EDA used the open evaluation library NVIDIA NeMo Gym to improve the reliability of its chip-design agent. The agent handles Liberty (.lib) file generation for standard-cell characterization; a domain-specific verifier scores final artifacts on coverage, validity, relative validation, accuracy and integrity, awarding zero reward if any gate fails. On a benchmark based on the open GF180MCU PDK — 229 standard cells across 36 PVT corners, with each tuning run restricted to two cells — the composite verification score rose from roughly 55% to about 95%. Agent turns fell from 155 to 53 (about 66% fewer) and output tokens from roughly 81K to 29K (about 64% fewer), after the team simplified overlapping file and shell interfaces and defined explicit JSON schemas for Model Context Protocol tool inputs based on verifier diagnostics. The runs used Claude Opus 4.8 in Claude Code as the fixed model and agent harness.

In-depth insight

It shows that grading final engineering artifacts rather than individual tool calls, then refining skills and tool descriptions, can improve both reliability and efficiency for engineering agents.

Agentic AI / Generative AI

Optimizing Agent Reliability and Tool Calling Efficiency for Chip Design Using NVIDIA NeMo Gym

Siemens EDA used agentic evaluations to cut agent turns by 66% while raising benchmark scores from 55% to 95%.

Oct 14, 2026

By Joshua Mabry, Chris Wing, Niranjan Sitapure, Kenton DeLathouwer and Ming Ming Zhang

#NVIDIA#NVIDIA NeMo Gym#Siemens EDA#Siemens Fuse EDA AI Agent#Solido Characterization Suite#Claude Opus 4.8#Claude Code#Model Context Protocol#GF180MCU PDK

Original · 9 min readRead the original
Group chat

No comments yet. Start the conversation.