Create

Sign in to ReadmeX

or

How we handle your data: Privacy Policy

ReadmeX

Your AI reading companion

What would you like to catch up on?

Pick a briefing, or ask your own question.

Your community and people briefings stay personal to you.

Story

OpenAI Dots vs. Meta Muse: comparing always-on AI agents

AI summary

Engadget compared Meta's Muse, released September 8, with OpenAI's always-on agents in ChatGPT, launched three weeks later. Both keep working after you leave, run their own cloud computers and connect to outside services; Dots live inside ChatGPT and are powered by GPT-6 Astra, while Muse runs on a dedicated secure VM and is reachable via its apps, the web or WhatsApp. On price, Muse's free tier has a usage cap, with Power at $20 and Maximum at $100 per month; the cheapest individual option for Dots is Pro 100 at $100 per month, and a Business Premium seat costs $100 per user per month billed annually or $125 monthly. Dots are rolling out to eligible Pro users outside the EEA, Switzerland and the UK, with Business Premium in supported ChatGPT regions and Enterprise in beta; Muse is available only in the US and Canada, and Amazon has blocked it from shopping on its site.

In-depth insight

Always-on agents are becoming a mainstream subscription feature, so price, permissions and regional availability are now the deciding factors.

OpenAI Dot vs. Meta Muse: How do these AI agents compare?

Both agents can keep working after you leave, but they differ considerably on price, permissions and where they can work.

By Husain Parvez Oct. 11, 2026 8:00 pm EST

Meta Muse logo opposite the OpenAI Dots logo and four colorful character mascots.

Image by Husain Parvez (Meta, OpenAI)

#OpenAI#Meta#Dots#Muse#ChatGPT#GPT-6 Astra#ChatGPT Work#Codex#WhatsApp#Amazon

Original · 3 min readRead the original
Group chat

No comments yet. Start the conversation.