Nano Banana 2.1 对比 ChatGPT
Google 已将 Gemini 中的 Nano Banana 图像生成器升级到 Nano Banana 2.1,Google AI Plus、Pro 和 Ultra 订阅用户现可默认使用该版本,免费用户仍使用 Nano Banana 2。Google 称新版本在细节清晰度、指令遵循、文字准确性和图像一致性方面有所提升。TechRadar 用相同提示词对比 Gemini 与 ChatGPT 的 Images 2.5,认为两者表现接近:Nano Banana 正确复现了复古旅行海报上的指定文字,而 ChatGPT 在俯拍书桌场景中完整呈现了物件,Google 的输出则把 3:15 误画成 3:00。
TechRadar 的对比测试显示,领先的图像生成器在日常创作任务上正接近持平,差异越来越取决于风格偏好。
Google has given its Nano Banana AI image generator another upgrade, and the latest version, Nano Banana 2.1, is arriving inside Google Gemini in an increasingly crowded field of tools that can turn a few sentences into remarkably convincing pictures. The promise is familiar, with sharper details, better instruction-following, more accurate text, and greater consistency across images. The real challenge is finding something that makes it meaningfully better than the competition.
Nano Banana's main rival, ChatGPT's image generator which is called Images 2.5, is hardly sitting around waiting to be overtaken. OpenAI has made considerable progress with realistic lighting, complicated compositions and text rendering, turning image generation into one of ChatGPT's most entertaining and genuinely useful features. With both companies pushing the technology forward, I wanted to see whether Google's latest upgrade had managed to pull ahead.
If you've got a Gemini account you'll find that it should have been upgraded to use Nano Banana 2.1 by now. To test the two image generators against each other I gave Gemini and ChatGPT identical prompts designed to test different abilities. I compared the resulting images side by side, with ChatGPT on the left and Gemini on the right. The results were surprisingly close, although the two generators often approached the same instructions with different artistic instincts.
#Google#Nano Banana 2.1#Gemini#ChatGPT#OpenAI#ChatGPT Images 2.5