Create

Sign in to ReadmeX

or

How we handle your data: Privacy Policy

ReadmeX

Your AI reading companion

What would you like to catch up on?

Pick a briefing, or ask your own question.

Your community and people briefings stay personal to you.

Story

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash Shows Reduced Phase-Sensitive Retrieval Weakness

AI summary

ByteDance Seed researchers linked periodic retrieval failures in DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Base to position-dependent behavior in chunked KV-cache compression, with a 40.2-point gap between the best and worst position groups in a controlled 128K-context test. LeiPhone AI tested DeepSeek V4.1-Flash through the official API and found all 64 fixed-sampling completions correct, although prediction probabilities varied as irrelevant prefix length changed. Seed’s data show the best-to-worst position gap narrowing from 40.2 points in V4-Flash-Base to 19.1 points after post-training and 6.1 points in V4.1-Flash.

In-depth insight

The results show that DeepSeek’s newer version reduced the measured position sensitivity of compressed-cache retrieval, while also demonstrating that average retrieval scores can conceal weaknesses at particular information positions.

导语:同一段代码,前面只增加无关Token,DeepSeek会改变答案吗?

字节发现 DeepSeek 的周期性弱点,我们实测了 V4.1,结果不太一样

同一段代码,前面只增加无关Token,DeepSeek会改变答案吗?

    作者丨李娜

    编辑丨岑峰

字节发现 DeepSeek 的周期性弱点,我们实测了 V4.1,结果不太一样

#DeepSeek#ByteDance Seed#DeepSeek V4.1-Flash#DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Base#DeepSeek V4#Qwen3-0.6B

Original · 9 min readRead the original
Group chat

No comments yet. Start the conversation.