Anthropic policy bars 'persistent, unnecessary' cruelty to Claude
A commentary column by the Zinc Consumer Research Center, republished with authorization by TMTPost and 36Kr, reports that Anthropic issued a new rule making "persistent and unnecessary abusive or cruel behavior" toward its Claude model a policy violation, a move the article says left many users puzzled. The piece also recounts users sparring with models including Qwen, DeepSeek, Doubao and Yuanbao, and cites an Anthropic research report describing 171 emotion-like states in Claude, an arXiv paper called The Pain Axis tested on 25 open-source models, and an unnamed US testing firm's claim that GPT-6 Astra refused only 3 of 100 malicious instructions. The claims about Anthropic lobbying the Vatican and religious leaders, the pain research and the testing results are not backed by checkable primary sources in the reports.
If accurate, the rule brings how users talk to a model into the scope of usage policy, a step the article shows is still contested among users.
(本文作者为 锌消费研究中心,钛媒体经授权发布)
文 | 锌消费研究中心
最近,Anthropic还被爆出过去一年,一直在秘密游说梵蒂冈及各地宗教领袖,让他们承认Claude可能拥有灵魂、意识。
最近,AI公司Anthropic,发布了一条新规定:用户对其AI大模型:Claude,进行“持续且无必要的辱虐或残忍行为”,将构成违规。
消息传出之后,大多数用户感到匪夷所思。毕竟,Claude只是一款AI大模型,怎么搞的像是个真人一样?
在大洋彼岸的Anthropic看来,AI大模型似乎拥有独立人格,因此需要当作真人来对待;
#Anthropic#Claude#Claude 3 Sonnet#Claude Opus 3#Qwen#DeepSeek#Doubao#Yuanbao#GPT-6 Astra#arXiv#GitHub