Seed 2.1 pro

Headlines · 2

1. 3d
   Seed 2.1 resists user challenges in a limited sycophancy test

   A Juejin author tested Seed 2.1 lite and Seed 2.1 pro through Doubao using 30 common-sense questions with standard answers. Each model received 90 challenges in total. With deep thinking enabled, the models reportedly changed no correct answers across 180 challenges. With deep thinking disabled, the author identified two answer changes, both in the lite variant. An automated script initially counted 41 changes, but manual review found only two. The self-reported test covered only common-sense questions in single-turn conversations and did not include coding, planning or research tasks.

   掘金 · 人工智能 · 🔥 0
2. 3d
   Seed 2.1 Study Compares Reasoning, Models, and Methodology

   The author ran 216 calls across Seed 2.1 lite and pro, reasoning toggles, and two prompting approaches on nine deep-research questions. Enabling reasoning produced the largest reported accuracy gains at nearly no additional cost, while upgrading from lite to pro improved accuracy but at a substantially higher cost per correct answer; the five-step methodology mainly benefited weaker configurations and evidence conformity. The experiment covers only nine questions, with wide confidence intervals and no p-values surviving Holm correction.

   掘金 · 人工智能 · 🔥 0

Experience and discussion from the community

Share my Seed 2.1 pro experienceAsk about Seed 2.1 pro