Qwen3.8 Max

Headlines · 4

1. 1d
   ScienceVision tests models’ 3D scientific reasoning

   ScienceVision evaluates AI models across biology, chemistry, medical imaging, architecture, and mechanical CAD using 250 questions built from real 3D data. According to 新智元, tasks require models to inspect, measure, and reason about 3D objects, with deterministic scoring and expert-authored reference answers. The reported top score was 0.53 from GPT-6 Astra with Codex, while no model led across all five fields.

   新智元 · 🔥 8
2. 2d
   OpenDS-World tests agents on real-web deep search

   A multi-institution team introduced OpenDS, a deep-search task paradigm, and OpenDS-World, a 200-task benchmark for research agents operating across the open web. According to 机器之心, the tasks cover four modalities, 42 resource formats and seven evidence-access requirements; GPT-6 Astra led the 12 tested models with 39.0% accuracy, while Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemini 3.8 Flash scored 38.0% and 36.5%. The evaluation also records tool failures, execution time, search termination decisions and other execution traces.

   机器之心 · 🔥 3
3. Oct 19
   Arena Week 42 leaderboard: kimi-k3-max enters coding top 10

   Arena published its blind-test rankings for Week 42 of 2026 (October 12–18), with the overall top stable: gemini-4-argon-high retained first place at 1525 points and claude-opus-5.5-high was second at 1507. On the coding board, Moonshot's kimi-k3-max held tenth with 1540 points, followed by Xiaomi's mimo-v2.6-pro in eleventh at 1539. Three models newly entered the rankings this week—gemini-3.5-flash-medium, mimo-v2.6-pro and flux-2-flex—and Arena notes the boards use anonymous blind votes and ELO, reflecting user preference rather than an absolute capability test.

   IT之家 AI · 🔥 0
4. Oct 12
   Arena weekly: Claude Opus 5.5 Max debuts first on agent leaderboard

   Arena published its Week 41 AI model leaderboard (Oct 5–11, 2026), where Anthropic's Claude Opus 5.5 Max debuted at No. 1 on the agent board with a 15.53% net improvement, a 17.29% task-confirmation success rate and a 0.37% tool-hallucination rate. On the overall board Gemini 4 Argon (High) stayed first at 1525 ELO with Anthropic models filling the rest of the top four, while new entries gpt-5.5 and gemini-3.5-flash-medium placed 29th and 30th. Chinese models sat in the upper-middle tier and moved little: Moonshot's kimi-k3-max 16th overall, Alibaba's qwen3.8-max 22nd, Xiaomi's mimo-v2.6-pro 26th and Z.ai's glm-5.3-max 27th, with glm-5.3-flash the highest Chinese model on the coding board at 27th. Rankings use anonymous blind-vote ELO scores (a percentage signal for the agent board) and reflect user preference rather than absolute capability.

   IT之家 AI · 🔥 0

Experience and discussion from the community

Share my Qwen3.8 Max experienceAsk about Qwen3.8 Max