Create

Sign in to ReadmeX

or

How we handle your data: Privacy Policy

ReadmeX

Your AI reading companion

What would you like to catch up on?

Pick a briefing, or ask your own question.

Your community and people briefings stay personal to you.

EMNLP

AI overview

Sign in and the AI will write an overview from our coverage.

Headlines · 2

  1. ConvFill pairs a 0.6B talker with a large reasoner for faster voice agents

    ConvFill is a voice-agent architecture developed by students from the University of Washington UbiComp Lab and presented at EMNLP. A 0.6B talker model uses interim “cheat notes” from a large reasoner model to respond quickly while the reasoner continues processing, then reads its completed response to sustain the conversation. The r/LocalLLaMA report’s author helped build a public demo but said the talker model would need to become smarter for the approach to work as intended.

    r/LocalLLaMA · 🔥 0
  2. Apple study compares plan-first vs retrieve-first tool discovery for LLM agents

    Apple Machine Learning Research published an EMNLP paper by Mingfei Zhang and co-authors comparing two ways tool-using LLM agents find APIs before planning: Retrieve-then-Plan (RtP), which embeds the query and retrieves similar tools, and Plan-then-Retrieve (PtR), in which the model first generates abstract tool stubs that become retrieval queries. On ToolBench's 46,984 API endpoints across 50 categories, RtP beat PtR on single-tool queries while PtR beat RtP on multi-tool queries; the crossover held at retrieval budgets k=1–20, registry sizes from 1k to 47k APIs, and with Gemini 2.5 Flash and gpt-oss-120b. The authors also describe a stub-hallucination failure mode, note that PtR's extra discovery call roughly doubles inference cost, and suggest complexity-adaptive routing using RtP's top-1 retrieval score.

    Apple Machine Learning Research · 🔥 0

Experience and discussion from the community

Share my EMNLP experienceAsk about EMNLP

Nobody has shared their experience with EMNLP yet.